| GameRank | Team | Score | W-L | Matchup | Prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ▲2 | Clemson | 4.09814 | 6-0 | ||
| 2 ▲4 | Alabama | 3.62241 | 7-0 | W 33–14 vs #4 Texas A&M (5-0) 10/22 | 55% |
| 3 ▼1 | Tennessee | 3.14667 | 5-2 | ||
| 4 ▼3 | Texas A&M | 3.01297 | 5-0 | L 14–33 @ #2 Alabama (7-0) 10/22 | 45% |
| 5 ▲3 | North Carolina | 2.63052 | 4-2 | W 35–14 @ #54 Virginia (2-3) 10/22 | 73% |
| 6 ▼1 | Florida St | 2.55901 | 4-2 | ||
| 7 ▲4 | Boise St | 2.32580 | 6-0 | W 28–27 vs #19 BYU (4-3) 10/20 | 60% |
| 8 ▼4 | Michigan | 2.26051 | 6-0 | W 41–8 vs #113 Illinois (1-4) 10/22 | 84% |
| 9 | Nebraska | 2.00554 | 6-0 | W 27–14 vs #109 Purdue (2-3) 10/22 | 81% |
| 10 | Air Force | 2.00243 | 3-2 | L 27–34 vs #103 Hawaii (2-3) 10/22 | 81% |
| 11 ▲7 | Louisville | 1.85940 | 5-1 | W 54–13 vs #41 NC State (3-2) 10/22 | 62% |
| 12 ▲2 | Georgia | 1.85007 | 3-3 | ||
| 13 ▲2 | W Michigan | 1.83452 | 6-0 | W 45–31 vs #45 E Michigan (4-2) 10/22 | 63% |
| 14 ▼1 | Navy | 1.80032 | 3-1 | W 42–28 vs #69 Memphis (4-1) 10/22 | 71% |
| 15 ▲8 | Ohio St | 1.76301 | 6-0 | L 21–24 @ #35 Penn St (4-2) 10/22 | 59% |
| 16 ▲3 | California | 1.72881 | 2-3 | W 52–49 vs #85 Oregon (1-4) 10/21 | 75% |
| 17 ▼1 | Virginia Tech | 1.65729 | 3-2 | W 37–16 vs #47 Miami FL (3-2) 10/20 | 61% |
| 18 ▼6 | USC | 1.58577 | 4-3 | ||
| 19 ▲6 | BYU | 1.53913 | 4-3 | L 27–28 @ #7 Boise St (6-0) 10/20 | 40% |
| 20 ▲10 | Pittsburgh | 1.52981 | 4-2 | ||
| 21 | Mississippi | 1.52670 | 2-3 | L 21–38 @ #62 LSU (3-2) 10/22 | 66% |
| 22 ▲5 | Utah | 1.48317 | 5-1 | W 52–45 @ #56 UCLA (3-4) 10/22 | 61% |
| 23 ▲1 | Washington | 1.44585 | 5-0 | W 41–17 vs #65 Oregon St (1-4) 10/22 | 65% |
| 24 ▲10 | Northwestern | 1.41165 | 3-2 | W 24–14 vs #75 Indiana (3-3) 10/22 | 67% |
| 25 ▼18 | Wyoming | 1.36812 | 3-2 | W 42–34 @ #102 Nevada (2-4) 10/22 | 74% |
| 26 ▲7 | Washington St | 1.35879 | 4-1 | W 37–32 @ #28 Arizona St (4-2) 10/22 | 50% |
| 27 ▲8 | Houston | 1.35257 | 5-1 | L 16–38 @ #115 SMU (1-4) 10/22 | 77% |
| 28 ▼2 | Arizona St | 1.33392 | 4-2 | L 32–37 vs #26 Washington St (4-1) 10/22 | 50% |
| 29 ▲15 | Vanderbilt | 1.32770 | 3-4 | ||
| 30 ▲26 | Arkansas | 1.31215 | 4-2 | L 3–56 @ #42 Auburn (4-2) 10/22 | 54% |
| 31 ▲11 | Florida | 1.26862 | 5-1 | ||
| 32 | South Alabama | 1.25307 | 2-3 | L 21–28 vs #57 Troy (4-1) 10/20 | 57% |
| 33 ▼4 | Stanford | 1.24996 | 4-2 | L 5–10 vs #37 Colorado (4-2) 10/22 | 51% |
| 34 ▲52 | Syracuse | 1.23442 | 2-4 | W 28–20 @ #100 Boston College (2-3) 10/22 | 71% |
| 35 ▼15 | Penn St | 1.22820 | 4-2 | W 24–21 vs #15 Ohio St (6-0) 10/22 | 41% |
| 36 ▼5 | West Virginia | 1.21887 | 4-0 | W 34–10 vs #94 TCU (3-2) 10/22 | 70% |
| 37 ▲25 | Colorado | 1.20643 | 4-2 | W 10–5 @ #33 Stanford (4-2) 10/22 | 49% |
| 38 ▲78 | New Mexico | 1.19710 | 2-3 | W 59–17 vs #120 ULM (1-4) 10/22 | 75% |
| 39 ▲1 | Oklahoma St | 1.14735 | 3-2 | W 44–20 @ #125 Kansas (0-5) 10/22 | 79% |
| 40 ▲1 | South Florida | 1.12248 | 5-1 | L 30–46 @ #83 Temple (3-3) 10/21 | 64% |
| 41 ▼19 | NC State | 1.11937 | 3-2 | L 13–54 @ #11 Louisville (5-1) 10/22 | 38% |
| 42 ▼3 | Auburn | 1.11937 | 4-2 | W 56–3 vs #30 Arkansas (4-2) 10/22 | 46% |
| 43 ▲5 | C Michigan | 1.10693 | 4-2 | L 17–31 @ #44 Toledo (4-1) 10/22 | 50% |
| 44 ▼7 | Toledo | 1.10382 | 4-1 | W 31–17 vs #43 C Michigan (4-2) 10/22 | 50% |
| 45 ▼17 | E Michigan | 1.09139 | 4-2 | L 31–45 @ #13 W Michigan (6-0) 10/22 | 37% |
| 46 ▲14 | Iowa | 1.07584 | 5-1 | L 9–17 vs #49 Wisconsin (4-2) 10/22 | 51% |
| 47 ▼4 | Miami FL | 1.06962 | 3-2 | L 16–37 @ #17 Virginia Tech (3-2) 10/20 | 39% |
| 48 ▼3 | Baylor | 1.05407 | 5-0 | ||
| 49 ▼13 | Wisconsin | 1.02298 | 4-2 | W 17–9 @ #46 Iowa (5-1) 10/22 | 49% |
| 50 ▼12 | Wake Forest | 0.99500 | 4-2 | ||
| 51 ▲18 | Georgia Tech | 0.99500 | 3-3 | ||
| 52 ▼5 | Appalachian St | 0.97012 | 4-2 | W 37–19 vs #71 Idaho (3-3) 10/22 | 58% |
| 53 ▼3 | San Diego St | 0.96701 | 4-1 | W 42–3 vs #114 San Jose St (1-5) 10/21 | 70% |
| 54 ▼2 | Virginia | 0.95768 | 2-3 | L 14–35 vs #5 North Carolina (4-2) 10/22 | 27% |
| 55 ▼4 | Kentucky | 0.95146 | 3-3 | W 40–38 vs #95 Mississippi St (2-4) 10/22 | 65% |
| 56 ▼2 | UCLA | 0.93281 | 3-4 | L 45–52 vs #22 Utah (5-1) 10/22 | 39% |
| 57 ▼11 | Troy | 0.92970 | 4-1 | W 28–21 @ #32 South Alabama (2-3) 10/20 | 43% |
| 58 ▲6 | Oklahoma | 0.89861 | 4-2 | W 66–59 @ #90 Texas Tech (2-3) 10/22 | 62% |
| 59 ▲9 | Minnesota | 0.89550 | 3-2 | W 34–32 vs #79 Rutgers (1-5) 10/22 | 57% |
| 60 ▲12 | Arkansas St | 0.87684 | 2-3 | ||
| 61 ▼44 | East Carolina | 0.80222 | 1-4 | L 19–31 @ #96 Cincinnati (2-3) 10/22 | 61% |
| 62 ▼1 | LSU | 0.79911 | 3-2 | W 38–21 vs #21 Mississippi (2-3) 10/22 | 34% |
| 63 ▼14 | Missouri | 0.79600 | 1-4 | L 45–51 vs #73 MTSU (3-2) 10/22 | 53% |
| 64 ▲1 | New Mexico St | 0.79289 | 2-4 | L 19–22 vs #78 Ga Southern (2-3) 10/22 | 54% |
| 65 ▼2 | Oregon St | 0.77734 | 1-4 | L 17–41 @ #23 Washington (5-0) 10/22 | 35% |
| 66 ▼8 | South Carolina | 0.74936 | 2-4 | W 34–28 vs #119 Massachusetts (1-6) 10/22 | 65% |
| 67 ▼14 | Connecticut | 0.74936 | 2-4 | L 16–24 vs #91 UCF (2-3) 10/22 | 58% |
| 68 ▲8 | Notre Dame | 0.74625 | 2-5 | ||
| 69 ▲12 | Memphis | 0.71826 | 4-1 | L 28–42 @ #14 Navy (3-1) 10/22 | 29% |
| 70 ▼3 | Duke | 0.71204 | 2-4 | ||
| 71 ▲30 | Idaho | 0.70893 | 3-3 | L 19–37 @ #52 Appalachian St (4-2) 10/22 | 42% |
| 72 ▲41 | WKU | 0.70583 | 3-3 | W 59–24 vs #82 Old Dominion (3-2) 10/22 | 53% |
| 73 ▲2 | MTSU | 0.69961 | 3-2 | W 51–45 @ #63 Missouri (1-4) 10/22 | 47% |
| 74 ▲17 | Louisiana Tech | 0.69961 | 3-3 | W 44–24 @ #105 Florida Intl (3-4) 10/22 | 60% |
| 75 ▼9 | Indiana | 0.69961 | 3-3 | L 14–24 @ #24 Northwestern (3-2) 10/22 | 33% |
| 76 ▼19 | Louisiana | 0.69650 | 1-4 | W 27–3 @ #106 Texas St (1-4) 10/22 | 60% |
| 77 ▼22 | Maryland | 0.68717 | 3-2 | W 28–17 vs #110 Michigan St (1-4) 10/22 | 61% |
| 78 ▼19 | Ga Southern | 0.68717 | 2-3 | W 22–19 @ #64 New Mexico St (2-4) 10/22 | 46% |
| 79 ▲32 | Rutgers | 0.68095 | 1-5 | L 32–34 @ #59 Minnesota (3-2) 10/22 | 43% |
| 80 ▼9 | Southern Miss | 0.67162 | 3-3 | ||
| 81 ▼2 | Army | 0.64986 | 3-2 | L 18–35 vs #112 North Texas (2-3) 10/22 | 60% |
| 82 ▼9 | Old Dominion | 0.63742 | 3-2 | L 24–59 @ #72 WKU (3-3) 10/22 | 47% |
| 83 ▲15 | Temple | 0.62809 | 3-3 | W 46–30 vs #40 South Florida (5-1) 10/21 | 36% |
| 84 ▼2 | Buffalo | 0.58456 | 1-4 | L 7–44 @ #104 N Illinois (1-5) 10/22 | 55% |
| 85 ▼11 | Oregon | 0.56279 | 1-4 | L 49–52 @ #16 California (2-3) 10/21 | 25% |
| 86 ▲11 | Texas | 0.55969 | 3-3 | L 21–24 @ #99 Kansas St (2-3) 10/22 | 53% |
| 87 ▼7 | Akron | 0.55969 | 3-3 | W 35–25 @ #92 Ball St (3-3) 10/22 | 51% |
| 88 ▲4 | Utah St | 0.55347 | 1-4 | W 38–20 vs #126 Fresno St (0-6) 10/22 | 64% |
| 89 ▼11 | UT San Antonio | 0.55036 | 2-3 | L 49–52 vs #107 UTEP (1-5) 10/22 | 54% |
| 90 ▲4 | Texas Tech | 0.55036 | 2-3 | L 59–66 vs #58 Oklahoma (4-2) 10/22 | 38% |
| 91 ▼21 | UCF | 0.54103 | 2-3 | W 24–16 @ #67 Connecticut (2-4) 10/22 | 42% |
| 92 ▲15 | Ball St | 0.54103 | 3-3 | L 25–35 vs #87 Akron (3-3) 10/22 | 49% |
| 93 ▼3 | Colorado St | 0.53170 | 2-4 | W 42–23 @ #101 UNLV (2-4) 10/22 | 53% |
| 94 ▼6 | TCU | 0.52548 | 3-2 | L 10–34 @ #36 West Virginia (4-0) 10/22 | 30% |
| 95 ▼11 | Mississippi St | 0.51926 | 2-4 | L 38–40 @ #55 Kentucky (3-3) 10/22 | 35% |
| 96 ▼11 | Cincinnati | 0.51615 | 2-3 | W 31–19 vs #61 East Carolina (1-4) 10/22 | 39% |
| 97 ▼20 | Tulane | 0.51304 | 2-3 | L 27–50 @ #98 Tulsa (3-2) 10/22 | 50% |
| 98 ▼3 | Tulsa | 0.50372 | 3-2 | W 50–27 vs #97 Tulane (2-3) 10/22 | 50% |
| 99 ▼16 | Kansas St | 0.50061 | 2-3 | W 24–21 vs #86 Texas (3-3) 10/22 | 47% |
| 100 ▼13 | Boston College | 0.49750 | 2-3 | L 20–28 vs #34 Syracuse (2-4) 10/22 | 29% |
| 101 ▲16 | UNLV | 0.47262 | 2-4 | L 23–42 vs #93 Colorado St (2-4) 10/22 | 47% |
| 102 ▼13 | Nevada | 0.47262 | 2-4 | L 34–42 vs #25 Wyoming (3-2) 10/22 | 26% |
| 103 ▼7 | Hawaii | 0.47262 | 2-3 | W 34–27 @ #10 Air Force (3-2) 10/22 | 19% |
| 104 ▲4 | N Illinois | 0.46951 | 1-5 | W 44–7 vs #84 Buffalo (1-4) 10/22 | 45% |
| 105 ▲5 | Florida Intl | 0.46640 | 3-4 | L 24–44 vs #74 Louisiana Tech (3-3) 10/22 | 40% |
| 106 ▼13 | Texas St | 0.46329 | 1-4 | L 3–27 vs #76 Louisiana (1-4) 10/22 | 40% |
| 107 ▼8 | UTEP | 0.46019 | 1-5 | W 52–49 @ #89 UT San Antonio (2-3) 10/22 | 46% |
| 108 ▼5 | Ohio | 0.46019 | 3-3 | W 14–10 @ #111 Kent (1-4) 10/22 | 52% |
| 109 ▼7 | Purdue | 0.45708 | 2-3 | L 14–27 @ #9 Nebraska (6-0) 10/22 | 19% |
| 110 ▼6 | Michigan St | 0.44464 | 1-4 | L 17–28 @ #77 Maryland (3-2) 10/22 | 39% |
| 111 ▼6 | Kent | 0.43220 | 1-4 | L 10–14 vs #108 Ohio (3-3) 10/22 | 48% |
| 112 ▼3 | North Texas | 0.42909 | 2-3 | W 35–18 @ #81 Army (3-2) 10/22 | 40% |
| 113 ▲12 | Illinois | 0.42598 | 1-4 | L 8–41 @ #8 Michigan (6-0) 10/22 | 16% |
| 114 ▲6 | San Jose St | 0.41355 | 1-5 | L 3–42 @ #53 San Diego St (4-1) 10/21 | 30% |
| 115 ▼3 | SMU | 0.41355 | 1-4 | W 38–16 vs #27 Houston (5-1) 10/22 | 23% |
| 116 ▼10 | Georgia St | 0.41355 | 1-5 | ||
| 117 ▼17 | Arizona | 0.41044 | 1-5 | ||
| 118 ▲4 | Miami OH | 0.40733 | 1-5 | W 40–26 @ #128 Bowling Green (0-6) 10/22 | 57% |
| 119 ▼5 | Massachusetts | 0.40422 | 1-6 | L 28–34 @ #66 South Carolina (2-4) 10/22 | 35% |
| 120 ▼1 | ULM | 0.39178 | 1-4 | L 17–59 @ #38 New Mexico (2-3) 10/22 | 25% |
| 121 ▼6 | Charlotte | 0.37001 | 1-5 | W 27–24 @ #123 Marshall (1-4) 10/22 | 52% |
| 122 ▼4 | Iowa St | 0.36069 | 1-5 | ||
| 123 | Marshall | 0.33581 | 1-4 | L 24–27 vs #121 Charlotte (1-5) 10/22 | 48% |
| 124 ▼3 | Rice | 0.31094 | 0-6 | ||
| 125 ▼1 | Kansas | 0.31094 | 0-5 | L 20–44 vs #39 Oklahoma St (3-2) 10/22 | 21% |
| 126 | Fresno St | 0.31094 | 0-6 | L 20–38 @ #88 Utah St (1-4) 10/22 | 36% |
| 127 | FL Atlantic | 0.31094 | 0-6 | ||
| 128 | Bowling Green | 0.31094 | 0-6 | L 26–40 vs #118 Miami OH (1-5) 10/22 | 43% |
FBS data last updated 3954h47m50s ago.